Six stages,
one pipeline.
What you see on the home page is the summary. This page is the long version — every stage covered in detail, with the visualizations you’ll see in your actual dashboard.
Find roles that actually fit.
Every weekday we run a LinkedIn-wide universal scrape against your filter set — your role, level, location, salary minimum, target industries, and the exclusion lists you set during onboarding.
The output is filtered through your daily ban-list (companies you don't want, keywords you can't stand) before it ever hits your board. The default is conservative — most listings are silenced — because the quality of the funnel matters more than the volume.
Free clients see this as the public job board. Paid clients get the same data, plus everything downstream.
Before & after, see your match uplift.
Every job that survives discovery is ATS-scored against your master CV. The score is a transparent percentage — keywords matched, skills matched, title alignment, format, tone — not a black box.
On Base and Plus we don't just show the score; we rewrite your CV until it clears 90+ for that specific role. Most untailored CVs land in the 40–60% range; ours typically clear 88–95%.
You see the deltas. If we add a keyword, it's marked. If we restructure a bullet, the original is preserved in your master. Nothing is hidden.
Tailored CVs, every single time.
Your master CV is the source of truth. For every application, we generate a tailored variant — different bullet phrasing, different keyword density, different section ordering — without you copy-pasting anything.
The variants are stored. If you want to see what we sent for the Stripe Senior PE role versus the Linear Staff Eng role, both files are in your dashboard.
ATS scoring is the gate; if a tailored CV doesn't clear 85%, it doesn't ship. We try multiple variants if needed and pick the highest-scoring one.
Our humans apply for you.
On Plus, real ops agents — not bots — submit your applications. They open the ATS portal, attach the right CV variant, answer the screening questions using your saved Q&A bank, and submit.
Why humans? ATSes are messy. Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable, JazzHR, BreezyHR, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, Recruitee, Pinpoint, Rippling — they all have quirks. Auto-applying with software produces a high junk-rate that gets your applications flagged.
Tier 2 "easy" ATSes (the eleven listed above) get the human-fast treatment. Stranger portals (Workday and beyond) we either skip or escalate to manual review depending on how much you want that role.
We don't let you get ghosted.
For every application, we surface the recruiter and (when findable) the hiring-manager dossier — full email, LinkedIn URL, company tier, last verified date.
Then we draft a follow-up in your voice. You see the draft, you edit if needed, you click send. We don't auto-send outreach because the wrong message at the wrong time damages relationships you're trying to build.
On Plus, we also draft 48-hour and 7-day follow-ups for any application without a response. You stay in control of every message that goes out.
- sarah.c@stripe.com
- linkedin.com/in/sarah-chen-stripe
- reports to
- Head of Eng Talent
- last contact
- follow-up sent · 2d ago
Every opportunity, one dashboard.
The daily tracker is the single screen you check each morning. Filter by stage, company, date, ATS-tier, or status. Skim it once a day; prep for the interviews that matter; ignore the rest.
Status pills cover the full lifecycle — applied, interviewing, draft (you haven't sent yet), queued (awaiting your sign-off on Plus), rejected. Match scores are visible per row.
A daily kit email lands at 9am with the new applications shipped overnight, follow-ups scheduled, and any roles that need your attention.
- interviewing92Senior Product EngineerLinear · today
- applied88Staff Frontend EngineerVercel · today
- applied85Founding EngineerStripe · yesterday
- draft79Senior Software EngineerNotion · yesterday
- queued78Platform EngineerPlaid · 2d ago
- rejected71Tech LeadCoinbase · 5d ago
Before & after.
What a tailored CV looks like vs. a generic one, side by side.
Vague objective, generic bullet points, zero keywords from the job description. ATS match score: ~25%
Role-specific headline, quantified bullets, job-matched keywords throughout. ATS match score: ~88%
Our system reads each JD and restructures your CV to maximize keyword alignment, quantify achievements, and match the formatting expectations of major ATSes — without you typing a single keyword by hand.